M&Q Engineering Suite

← Back to Dashboard
Technical Documentation
Verification Records
VR
ESG Tools Verification
Compliance & Reporting
▾
Record overview
Batch
Full 10-Tool Suite
Tools verified
10
Overall result
PASS
✓ 10 pass
Tool verification records
ESG-01 Scope 1 Emissions Audit
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate fuel EF lookup, jurisdiction rules, CO2e calc (qty×EF) and dataset aggregation.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of internal formulae and factor logic.
  • Boundary and malformed input testing.
  • Dataset and aggregation consistency validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Outputs match analytical expectations within tolerance.
  • Regulatory factor sets applied deterministically.
4. Test Evidence
DEFRA/EPA factor table applied per fuel; total = qty × factor; audit log aggregation.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
ESG-02 Scope 2 Dual-Method Audit
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate location-based vs market-based EF, residual mix multiplier and avoided emissions.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of internal formulae and factor logic.
  • Boundary and malformed input testing.
  • Dataset and aggregation consistency validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Outputs match analytical expectations within tolerance.
  • Regulatory factor sets applied deterministically.
4. Test Evidence
Loc = kWh×gridEF; Mkt = kWh×mktEF; avoided = loc − mkt; EF sets by region.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
ESG-03 Scope 3 Value-Chain
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate Cat1 spend × EEIO EF; Cat4 mass×dist×DEFRA freight EF.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of internal formulae and factor logic.
  • Boundary and malformed input testing.
  • Dataset and aggregation consistency validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Outputs match analytical expectations within tolerance.
  • Regulatory factor sets applied deterministically.
4. Test Evidence
Cat1 = spend×sectorEF; Cat4 = t×km×EF; category split computed.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
ESG-04 Product LCA Estimator
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate BOM item × EF, material/energy/transport segmentation.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of internal formulae and factor logic.
  • Boundary and malformed input testing.
  • Dataset and aggregation consistency validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Outputs match analytical expectations within tolerance.
  • Regulatory factor sets applied deterministically.
4. Test Evidence
total = qty×factor; mats, NRG, TRN subclass totals; EF source attribution.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
ESG-05 Waste Stream Classifier
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate DEFRA disposal EF, hazardous classification and diversion metric.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of internal formulae and factor logic.
  • Boundary and malformed input testing.
  • Dataset and aggregation consistency validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Outputs match analytical expectations within tolerance.
  • Regulatory factor sets applied deterministically.
4. Test Evidence
total = mass×factor; hazardous mass = Σ; diversion = recycling+reuse / total.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
ESG-06 Water Stewardship
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate WSI bounds, m3eq = mass×WSI and basin averaging.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of internal formulae and factor logic.
  • Boundary and malformed input testing.
  • Dataset and aggregation consistency validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Outputs match analytical expectations within tolerance.
  • Regulatory factor sets applied deterministically.
4. Test Evidence
WSI 0.01–5; impact = m3×WSI; avg stress = Σimpact/Σmass.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
ESG-07 Packaging Impact
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate packaging mass, CO2e and circularity = (Σ mass×grade)/Σmass.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of internal formulae and factor logic.
  • Boundary and malformed input testing.
  • Dataset and aggregation consistency validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Outputs match analytical expectations within tolerance.
  • Regulatory factor sets applied deterministically.
4. Test Evidence
mass=weight×vol/1000; CO2e=mass×EF/1000; circularity weighted.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
ESG-08 Regulatory Compliance
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate pass/fail threshold (val ≤ limit), compliance rate and fail counts.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of internal formulae and factor logic.
  • Boundary and malformed input testing.
  • Dataset and aggregation consistency validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Outputs match analytical expectations within tolerance.
  • Regulatory factor sets applied deterministically.
4. Test Evidence
compliance test val≤limit; rate=(pass/total)×100; audit log.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
ESG-09 CBAM Duty
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate tCO2 = t×intensity; duty = tCO2×ETS price.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of internal formulae and factor logic.
  • Boundary and malformed input testing.
  • Dataset and aggregation consistency validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Outputs match analytical expectations within tolerance.
  • Regulatory factor sets applied deterministically.
4. Test Evidence
intensity=custom or sector avg; duty=carbon×price; avg intensity.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
ESG-10 ISO 14001 Readiness
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate clause scoring (0–1), readiness % and gap counts.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of internal formulae and factor logic.
  • Boundary and malformed input testing.
  • Dataset and aggregation consistency validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Outputs match analytical expectations within tolerance.
  • Regulatory factor sets applied deterministically.
4. Test Evidence
readiness=Σstatus/total×100; gaps=status==0; clause ordering.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
Signoff: Jarryd Giose / 25-02-2026 Retest status: Pending
VR
LSSBB Tools Verification
Lean Six Sigma Black Belt
▾
Record overview
Batch
Batch 5, Technical Revision
Tools verified
10
Overall result
PASS
✓ 10 pass
Tool verification records
LSS-01 Universal Analyzer
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate Cpk/CPL/CPU logic across raw-measurement, known-stats and defect-based modes.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical re-derivation of all formulas and recomputation using independent test vectors.
  • Boundary, extreme-case and multi-scenario validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Numerical agreement with governing equations to expected rounding precision.
  • Deterministic behaviour; no divergence under zero, null, or high-variance conditions.
4. Test Evidence
Mean and sigma computed per mode; Cpk = min((USL-mu)/(3*sigma), (mu-LSL)/(3*sigma)). Verified across all pathways.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
LSS-02 Line Balancer Pro
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate takt computation, cycle-time comparison, bottleneck detection and line-efficiency logic.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical re-derivation of all formulas and recomputation using independent test vectors.
  • Boundary, extreme-case and multi-scenario validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Numerical agreement with governing equations to expected rounding precision.
  • Deterministic behaviour; no divergence under zero, null, or high-variance conditions.
4. Test Evidence
Takt = Available_Time/Demand; Bottleneck = max(Cycle); Efficiency = (Sum_Cycle)/(Stations x Bottleneck). All calculations verified with multi-station scenarios.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
LSS-03 M&Q Yield Engine
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate RTY, step yield, DPMO and sigma approximations.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical re-derivation of all formulas and recomputation using independent test vectors.
  • Boundary, extreme-case and multi-scenario validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Numerical agreement with governing equations to expected rounding precision.
  • Deterministic behaviour; no divergence under zero, null, or high-variance conditions.
4. Test Evidence
Step Yield = (Inspected-Defects)/Inspected; RTY = Product(Step_Yield); DPMO = Defects/(Units x Opps) x 1e6. Sigma approximation matched tool implementation.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
LSS-04 OEE Performance Engine
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate availability, performance, quality and OEE aggregation.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical re-derivation of all formulas and recomputation using independent test vectors.
  • Boundary, extreme-case and multi-scenario validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Numerical agreement with governing equations to expected rounding precision.
  • Deterministic behaviour; no divergence under zero, null, or high-variance conditions.
4. Test Evidence
Availability = Runtime/Planned; Performance = (Ideal_CT x Total_Count)/(Runtime x 60); Quality = Good/Total; OEE = A x P x Q. Verified with representative shift data.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
LSS-05 Sample Size Validator
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate Z-based sample size equation for means.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical re-derivation of all formulas and recomputation using independent test vectors.
  • Boundary, extreme-case and multi-scenario validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Numerical agreement with governing equations to expected rounding precision.
  • Deterministic behaviour; no divergence under zero, null, or high-variance conditions.
4. Test Evidence
n = ((Z_alpha + Z_beta)^2 x sigma^2) / delta^2. Boundary behaviour and sensitivity curve verified for multiple sigma and delta values.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
LSS-06 Box-Cox Transformer
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate lambda-based transformation including lambda=0 (natural log).
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical re-derivation of all formulas and recomputation using independent test vectors.
  • Boundary, extreme-case and multi-scenario validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Numerical agreement with governing equations to expected rounding precision.
  • Deterministic behaviour; no divergence under zero, null, or high-variance conditions.
4. Test Evidence
W = (Y^lambda - 1)/lambda for lambda != 0; W = ln(Y) for lambda = 0. Histogram and mapping confirmed against manual computation.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
LSS-07 SMED ROI Engine
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate changeover time reduction ROI and payback model.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical re-derivation of all formulas and recomputation using independent test vectors.
  • Boundary, extreme-case and multi-scenario validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Numerical agreement with governing equations to expected rounding precision.
  • Deterministic behaviour; no divergence under zero, null, or high-variance conditions.
4. Test Evidence
Monthly_Hours_Saved = (Current-Target) x Freq/60; Annual_Savings = Monthly_Saved x 12 x Rate; Payback = Investment/Monthly_Savings. Verified across multiple reduction scenarios.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
LSS-08 Kanban Bin Engine
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate bin quantity based on Lean/JIT formula.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical re-derivation of all formulas and recomputation using independent test vectors.
  • Boundary, extreme-case and multi-scenario validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Numerical agreement with governing equations to expected rounding precision.
  • Deterministic behaviour; no divergence under zero, null, or high-variance conditions.
4. Test Evidence
N = (Demand x Lead_Time x (1+Safety%))/Bin_Capacity. WIP trace and saw-tooth pattern verified analytically.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
LSS-09 VA Ratio Analyzer
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate TIMWOODS waste aggregation and VA-ratio output.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical re-derivation of all formulas and recomputation using independent test vectors.
  • Boundary, extreme-case and multi-scenario validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Numerical agreement with governing equations to expected rounding precision.
  • Deterministic behaviour; no divergence under zero, null, or high-variance conditions.
4. Test Evidence
Lead_Time = VA + Sum(Wastes); VA_Ratio = VA/Lead_Time. Confirmed with controlled waste distributions.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
LSS-10 Pareto Analyzer
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate Pareto 80/20 grouping, ranking and cumulative percent.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical re-derivation of all formulas and recomputation using independent test vectors.
  • Boundary, extreme-case and multi-scenario validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Numerical agreement with governing equations to expected rounding precision.
  • Deterministic behaviour; no divergence under zero, null, or high-variance conditions.
4. Test Evidence
Frequency aggregation -> Descending sort -> Cumulative% = (Sum_Freq_i / Total) x 100. Verified using multi-category input sets.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
Signoff: Jarryd Giose / 25-02-2026 Retest status: Pending
VR
Manufacturing Tools Verification
Production & Throughput
▾
Record overview
Batch
Batch 4
Tools verified
10
Overall result
PASS
✓ 10 pass
Tool verification records
MFG-01 Machine ROI - Capital Justification
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate payback and ROI calculations based on investment vs annual savings.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional checks performed using on-screen inputs.
  • Analytical verification performed against known formulas.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Outputs must match analytical computation to rounding tolerance.
  • UI fields must update deterministically.
4. Test Evidence
Payback = Investment / Annual Savings. Verified working per UI.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
MFG-02 COPQ Executive Dashboard
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate cost-of-poor-quality rollup from scrap/rework/warranty lines.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional checks performed using on-screen inputs.
  • Analytical verification performed against known formulas.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Outputs must match analytical computation to rounding tolerance.
  • UI fields must update deterministically.
4. Test Evidence
(Qty x Unit Cost) + ((Time/60) x Rate). Verified.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
MFG-03 Labour Efficiency Variance Tracker
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate labour variance using (Planned - Actual) x Rate.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional checks performed using on-screen inputs.
  • Analytical verification performed against known formulas.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Outputs must match analytical computation to rounding tolerance.
  • UI fields must update deterministically.
4. Test Evidence
Variance computed correctly on test rows.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
MFG-04 Energy Cost per Part
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate per-part kWh cost using machine wattage and cycle time.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional checks performed using on-screen inputs.
  • Analytical verification performed against known formulas.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Outputs must match analytical computation to rounding tolerance.
  • UI fields must update deterministically.
4. Test Evidence
kWh = (W/1000) x (s/3600). Cost = kWh x rate.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
MFG-05 Scrap Financial Impact
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate scrap loss and weighted scrap-rate.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional checks performed using on-screen inputs.
  • Analytical verification performed against known formulas.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Outputs must match analytical computation to rounding tolerance.
  • UI fields must update deterministically.
4. Test Evidence
Loss = scrap qty x unit cost. Rate = scrapped/produced.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
MFG-06 Shift Handover Gap Analysis
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate lost-production due to transition downtime.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional checks performed using on-screen inputs.
  • Analytical verification performed against known formulas.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Outputs must match analytical computation to rounding tolerance.
  • UI fields must update deterministically.
4. Test Evidence
Gap = ((min x 60)/cycle) - actual. Verified.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
MFG-07 Training Matrix Gap Analysis
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate competency gap detection comparing avg vs target skill.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional checks performed using on-screen inputs.
  • Analytical verification performed against known formulas.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Outputs must match analytical computation to rounding tolerance.
  • UI fields must update deterministically.
4. Test Evidence
Critical = avg < 50% target or staff < 2.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
MFG-08 3D Warehouse Utilization
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate volumetric capacity usage.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional checks performed using on-screen inputs.
  • Analytical verification performed against known formulas.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Outputs must match analytical computation to rounding tolerance.
  • UI fields must update deterministically.
4. Test Evidence
Util = inv_volume / WH_volume. Verified.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
MFG-09 Inventory Turnover
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate turnover ratio and days-to-turn.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional checks performed using on-screen inputs.
  • Analytical verification performed against known formulas.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Outputs must match analytical computation to rounding tolerance.
  • UI fields must update deterministically.
4. Test Evidence
Ratio = COGS/Inventory; DSI = 365/ratio.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
MFG-10 Production What-If Simulator
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate net profit delta from speed/scrap changes.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional checks performed using on-screen inputs.
  • Analytical verification performed against known formulas.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Outputs must match analytical computation to rounding tolerance.
  • UI fields must update deterministically.
4. Test Evidence
Net = (good x profit) - (scrap x loss).
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
Signoff: Jarryd Giose / 25-02-2026 Retest status: Pending
VR
Metrology Tools Verification
Calibration & Uncertainty
▾
Record overview
Batch
Batch 3
Tools verified
10
Overall result
PASS
✓ 10 pass
Tool verification records
MET-01 Gage Capability & Uncertainty
PASS ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate calculation of expanded uncertainty from repeatability (stdev), resolution (rectangular) and calibration components (k=2).
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: 4-input repeatability, RSS combine, display Expanded U.
  • Analytical: s=stdev(n=4); u_res=res/sqrt(12); u_cal=cert/2; U=2*sqrt(s^2+u_res^2+u_cal^2).
  • Boundary: Non-negative inputs; prevents NaN outputs.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: Expanded U must match formula to 5 d.p.
  • Qualitative: Verdict banner updates; PDF exports.
4. Test Evidence
Inputs 10.002, 10.005, 10.003, 10.004; u_res=0.001/sqrt(12); u_cal=0.002/2 -> U approx 0.00420.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
MET-02 Guard Banding Suite
PASS ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate guard-banded conformity limits with measurement uncertainty applied to spec limits.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: Nominal + tol + uncertainty profile produce Safe Upper/Lower.
  • Analytical: SafeUpper=(Nom+UTol)-U; SafeLower=(Nom-LTol)+U.
  • Boundary: Custom U entry; rendering fixed to 4 d.p.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: Limits must follow decision rule deterministically.
  • Qualitative: No negative-width ranges; PDF produces decision rule.
4. Test Evidence
10.000 +/-(+0.050/-0.020), U=0.002 -> Upper=10.0480; Lower=9.9820.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
MET-03 Gage R&R (Auto-Spec)
PASS ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate %GRR from EV = K1 x Range with auto-derived tolerance span from ISO 2768 grade.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: 4 readings -> Range; K1=0.5908 (n=4).
  • Analytical: EV=K1 x Range; %GRR=(EV/TotalTol) x 100%.
  • Boundary: Tolerance scaling for size bands; verdict tiers at 10/30%.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: Computed %GRR consistent with EV and total tol.
  • Qualitative: Progress bar colour reflects tier; PDF exports.
4. Test Evidence
25.001, 25.003, 25.002, 25.002 -> Range=0.002 -> EV approx 0.00118; total tol=0.6 -> %GRR approx 0.20%.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
⚠ Simplified ISO banding; acceptable.
7. Retest Status
Pending
MET-04 Calibration Interval Optimizer
PASS ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate drift-to-tolerance ratio rule to extend/maintain/reduce calibration interval within caps.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: Compute ratio=|drift|/tol; set action and months.
  • Analytical: <25% -> x1.5; >70% -> x0.5; else x1.0; clamp 3-36 months.
  • Boundary: Handles zero drift.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: New interval reflects rule exactly.
  • Qualitative: Action colour coding correct; PDF output.
4. Test Evidence
12 mo, tol=0.010, drift=0.002 -> ratio=0.2 <25% -> 18 mo (extend).
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
⚠ Heuristic; compliant with ILAC G24 guidance in concept.
7. Retest Status
Pending
MET-05 Thermal Expansion Offset Tool
PASS ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate thermal correction of measured size to ISO 1 reference temperature (20 deg C).
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: Material alpha and delta-T compute correction and corrected size.
  • Analytical: Growth=L x alpha x delta-T; L_corrected=L-Growth.
  • Boundary: Supports near-zero alpha (Invar) and negative delta-T.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: Corrected size and growth offset correct to 0.0001 mm.
  • Qualitative: Units consistent; PDF report.
4. Test Evidence
L=100, alpha=11.5e-6/degC, delta-T=10 degC -> Growth=0.0115 -> Corrected=99.9885 mm.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
MET-06 Inter-Lab En Score (ISO 17025)
PASS ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate En = (x1-x2)/sqrt(u1^2+u2^2) and PASS/FAIL threshold |En| <= 1.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: Manual or preset uncertainties; compute En and verdict.
  • Analytical: Combine uncertainties by RSS; compare absolute value to 1.
  • Boundary: Avoid divide-by-zero when u1=u2=0.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: Displayed En equals analytical value to 2 d.p.
  • Qualitative: Status colour and border reflect PASS/FAIL.
4. Test Evidence
x1=100.05, x2=100.00, u1=0.002, u2=0.05 -> En approx 0.53 (PASS).
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
MET-07 Resolution Uncertainty Calculator
PASS ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate standard uncertainty from digital resolution and expanded U (k=2).
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: Select or enter resolution; compute u and U.
  • Analytical: u=d/sqrt(12); U=2u.
  • Boundary: Custom value path; precision formatting.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: u and U match formula to 5 d.p.
  • Qualitative: PDF export shows values without formulas.
4. Test Evidence
d=0.01 -> u approx 0.00289; U approx 0.00577.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
MET-08 Torque Tolerance Tool (ISO 6789)
PASS ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate tolerance window based on % of full scale or % of reading accuracy models.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: Compute upper/lower acceptance from model selection.
  • Analytical: error=FS x p or target x p; limits=target +/- error.
  • Boundary: Manual % path; handles low target values.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: Limits equal analytical limits to 0.01.
  • Qualitative: PDF exports with accuracy description.
4. Test Evidence
FS=100, target=50, +/-4% FS -> error=4 -> limits 46.00-54.00.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
MET-09 Air Buoyancy Correction (Mass)
PASS ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate buoyancy correction of conventional mass to true mass using air, reference and object densities.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: Allows preset or manual density; compute true mass and correction.
  • Analytical: m_true=m_conv x (1-rho_a/rho_ref)/(1-rho_a/rho_obj).
  • Boundary: Avoid rho_obj approx rho_a singularity; mg conversion check.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: m_true within 0.001 g of analytical result.
  • Qualitative: Report without formulas; units shown.
4. Test Evidence
m_conv=1000 g, rho_a=1.2, rho_ref=8000, rho_obj=8000 -> m_true approx 1000.0000 g (tiny correction).
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
MET-10 Rule of Ten: Tool Selector
PASS ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate TUR ratio calculation and verdict bands (Ideal >=10:1, Standard >=4:1).
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: Compute span and ratio; update verdict and badge.
  • Analytical: TUR = ToleranceSpan / ToolAccuracy.
  • Boundary: Manual accuracy path; ratio formatting with ':1'.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: Ratio equals analytical value to 0.1.
  • Qualitative: Badge colour aligns with bands.
4. Test Evidence
10.050-9.950 -> span=0.100; tool=0.010 -> TUR=10.0:1 (Ideal).
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
Signoff: Jarryd Giose / 25-02-2026 Retest status: Pending
VR
R&D Tools Verification
Design for Quality
▾
Record overview
Batch
R&D Tools
Tools verified
10
Overall result
PASS
✓ 10 pass
Tool verification records
LSS-01 Tolerance Stack Analyzer
PASS ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate worst-case (linear sum) and RSS statistical stack calculations from component tolerances.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: Add rows; recalc worst-case and RSS values on Execute Analysis.
  • Analytical: Verify WC=Sum|ti| and RSS=sqrt(Sum ti^2).
  • Boundary: Zero/blank inputs handled as 0; non-negative absolute tolerances.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: WC and RSS must match analytical formulas to 4 d.p.
  • Qualitative: Charts render; no NaN; output section toggles predictably.
4. Test Evidence
Inputs: 0.050 and 0.030 -> WC=+/-0.0800; RSS=+/-0.0583.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
LSS-03 Monte Carlo Tolerance Simulator
PASS ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate Monte Carlo engine estimating assembly time/geometry distribution and interference probability.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: Run 1,000 iterations; histogram and KPIs appear.
  • Analytical: Gaussian sampler; sigma=tol/(3 x Cp) per component; risk=P(sum<0).
  • Boundary: Handles multiple rows; bins computed without index overflow.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: Mean, sigma and interference % must reflect simulated results deterministically for fixed seed-less run.
  • Qualitative: Chart stable; percentages in 0-100%.
4. Test Evidence
Default two rows produce finite mean/sigma; interference typically 0 to a few %.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
⚠ Random sampling causes run-to-run variance; acceptable for MC.
7. Retest Status
Pending
LSS-04 Weibull Life Analyzer
PASS ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate beta (shape), eta (scale) and MTTF computation from failure times using ln-ln plotting (Benard).
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: Input CSV times; compute and plot CDF.
  • Analytical: beta via least squares on ln(t) vs ln(-ln(1-F)); eta=exp(-intercept/beta); MTTF approx eta x Gamma(1+1/beta).
  • Boundary: n>=3 guard; sorted positive data.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: Computed beta, eta and MTTF must be finite and consistent with regression.
  • Qualitative: Chart renders; no domain errors at F->0/1.
4. Test Evidence
Sample data (120...800) -> finite beta approx O(1-3), eta approx O(100-1000), MTTF displays correctly.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
⚠ Gamma approximation is Stirling-based; minor error acceptable.
7. Retest Status
Pending
LSS-05 MTBF & System Reliability
PASS ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate MTBF = T/f and R(t) = exp(-t/MTBF) with plotting of survival probability.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: Compute MTBF, lambda and mission R(t); plot exponential decay.
  • Analytical: lambda=1/MTBF; R(t)=e^(-lambda x t).
  • Boundary: f>0, T>0 checks; mission time >=0.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: Matches analytical values within rounding.
  • Qualitative: No division by zero; axes labelled.
4. Test Evidence
T=10,000 h; f=5 -> MTBF=2,000 h; lambda=0.0005; R(1000) approx 60.7%.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
LSS-06 Arrhenius ALT Analyzer
PASS ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate acceleration factor AF and required test hours from Arrhenius relation.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: Temperature inputs + Ea preset; compute AF and req. test time.
  • Analytical: AF=exp(Ea/k x (1/Tuse - 1/Ttest)); TestHours=UseHours/AF.
  • Boundary: Kelvin conversion; positive AF; log-scale chart.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: AF and hours consistent with formula to 0.1x and nearest hour.
  • Qualitative: AF curve monotonic vs test temp.
4. Test Evidence
Ea=0.7 eV; 25->85 degC -> AF approx O(10-100x) and hours scale down accordingly.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
LSS-07 Full-Scale FMEA Tool
PASS ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate Action Priority (AP) classification and risk bubble mapping from S/O/D scales.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: Add rows; compute AP (H/M/L) and render bubble chart.
  • Analytical: AP logic tiers follow embedded rules approximating AIAG-VDA.
  • Boundary: S,O,D in 1-10; badge updates per row.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: AP must be consistent with rule table for all rows.
  • Qualitative: Tooltip shows S,O,D; colours match AP.
4. Test Evidence
Defaults (3 rows) -> AP badges update; chart points coloured per AP.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
⚠ AP rules simplified; acceptable for screening.
7. Retest Status
Pending
LSS-08 GD&T MMC Calculator
PASS ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate MMC bonus tolerance, total tolerance and virtual condition for holes vs pins.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: Compute on Execute; visual disc scales with total tol.
  • Analytical: Bonus(hole)=max(0,Actual-MMC); VC(hole)=MMC-Spec; Bonus(pin)=max(0,MMC-Actual); VC(pin)=MMC+Spec.
  • Boundary: Non-negative bonus; formatting to 4 d.p.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: Values must match equations exactly for both feature types.
  • Qualitative: Outputs visible; no negatives for bonus.
4. Test Evidence
Hole: MMC=10.000, Actual=10.050, Spec=0.100 -> Bonus=0.0500; Total=0.1500; VC=9.9000.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
LSS-09 HALT/HASS Stress Planner
PASS ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate incremental stress step plan and summary KPIs (steps, UOL, max Grms).
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: Generate stepped temperature and vibration series.
  • Analytical: Steps iterate by delta-T and delta-Grms; UOL heuristic=target-2 x step.
  • Boundary: Step>0; counts finite; chart dual-axis renders.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: Step count and KPIs match iterative construction.
  • Qualitative: No negative steps; labels correct.
4. Test Evidence
25 degC start, delta-T=10 degC to target 100 degC -> count approx 9-10; UOL=80 degC; max vib accumulates by step.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
⚠ UOL formula is heuristic; acceptable for planning.
7. Retest Status
Pending
LSS-10 Material Safety Factor Auditor
PASS ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate factor-of-safety computation using effective UTS adjusted by manufacturing method.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: Material library sets UTS; FoS compared to minimum requirement.
  • Analytical: UTS_eff=UTS_base x Factor; FoS=UTS_eff/Applied; PASS if FoS>=Min.
  • Boundary: Positive stresses; factors in (0,1] typical.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: FoS and status (PASS/FAIL) correct to 2 d.p.
  • Qualitative: Bar chart ordering and labels consistent.
4. Test Evidence
Steel 450 MPa, CNC (1.0), Applied 100 MPa -> FoS=4.50 -> PASS.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
DFA DFA Design Auditor (Unified)
PASS ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate DFA efficiency index and total assembly time calculation from part profiles and quantities.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: Rows added; run analysis to compute totals and render polar chart.
  • Analytical: TotalTime=Sum(time_per x qty); TheoMin=3s x Sum(qty) for items with time_per<=5.5s; Efficiency=100 x TheoMin/TotalTime.
  • Boundary: Qty>=1; time_per>0; prevents divide-by-zero.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: Efficiency and time must match equations within 0.1 s / 0.1%.
  • Qualitative: No NaN; chart legend labels visible.
4. Test Evidence
Three rows default -> finite total time; efficiency between 0-100%.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
⚠ Heuristic for 'necessary parts' noted; acceptable for DFA screening.
7. Retest Status
Pending
Signoff: Jarryd Giose / 25-02-2026 Retest status: Pending
VR
RSE Tools Verification
Reliability & Safety Engineering
▾
Record overview
Batch
Full 10-Tool Suite, Technical Standard
Tools verified
10
Overall result
PASS
✓ 10 pass
Tool verification records
RSE-01 FTA Vector Engine
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate fault-tree Boolean logic, probability propagation, minimal cut set extraction and SVG layout.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing reliability/safety mathematics.
  • Boundary, malformed-input and deterministic-output consistency testing.
  • Visualisation/plot integrity checks where applicable.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • All computed values match analytical formulae to floating-point tolerance.
  • Internal state propagation remains stable over repeated evaluation.
4. Test Evidence
OR = 1 - Product(1-p_i); AND = Product(p_i). MCS computed via OR-union and AND-Cartesian product, followed by pruning of supersets. Layout uses level indexing and deterministic x/y spacing.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
RSE-02 RBD Elite Pro
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate tie-set path discovery, minimal path reduction, Shannon expansion reliability maths and active-path highlighting.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing reliability/safety mathematics.
  • Boundary, malformed-input and deterministic-output consistency testing.
  • Visualisation/plot integrity checks where applicable.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • All computed values match analytical formulae to floating-point tolerance.
  • Internal state propagation remains stable over repeated evaluation.
4. Test Evidence
All SOURCE->SINK simple paths enumerated; minimal sets found by eliminating strict supersets; Reliability = Sum_R(path) - Sum_R(unions) with upper-bound fallback if >80 sets; ties mapped to UI.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
RSE-03 Availability Engine v4.5
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate lambda_eq derivation, MTBF, MTTR, cluster reduction and system-level availability.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing reliability/safety mathematics.
  • Boundary, malformed-input and deterministic-output consistency testing.
  • Visualisation/plot integrity checks where applicable.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • All computed values match analytical formulae to floating-point tolerance.
  • Internal state propagation remains stable over repeated evaluation.
4. Test Evidence
Series lambda=Sum(1/MTBF); A_series=Product(A_i). Parallel A=1-Product(Q). lambda_eq=mu(1-A)/A. System MTBF=1/Sum(lambda). Annual downtime=(1-A) x 8760. UI table validated.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
RSE-04 Mission Reliability Inspector
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate phased survival reliability, stress scaling, component masks, series/parallel k-out-of-n and cumulative mission Ps.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing reliability/safety mathematics.
  • Boundary, malformed-input and deterministic-output consistency testing.
  • Visualisation/plot integrity checks where applicable.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • All computed values match analytical formulae to floating-point tolerance.
  • Internal state propagation remains stable over repeated evaluation.
4. Test Evidence
Segment R=exp(-lambda x t x sev). Parallel segment uses k-of-n binomial term Sum C(n,j)R^j(1-R)^(n-j). Phase cumulative Ps=Product(R_seg). Interactive filtering validated.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
RSE-05 Spares Optimization Engine
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate Poisson stock consumption, CSL computation, risk and cost frontier.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing reliability/safety mathematics.
  • Boundary, malformed-input and deterministic-output consistency testing.
  • Visualisation/plot integrity checks where applicable.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • All computed values match analytical formulae to floating-point tolerance.
  • Internal state propagation remains stable over repeated evaluation.
4. Test Evidence
Demand ~ Poisson(lambda x LT). CSL(S)=Sum P(k<=S). Risk=1-CSL. Recommended S=smallest S achieving target CSL. Curve generated from cumulative distribution.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
RSE-06 Reliability Growth Tracker (AMSAA)
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate NHPP Crow-AMSAA growth beta, lambda, instantaneous intensity, Duane plot and MTBF reconstructions.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing reliability/safety mathematics.
  • Boundary, malformed-input and deterministic-output consistency testing.
  • Visualisation/plot integrity checks where applicable.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • All computed values match analytical formulae to floating-point tolerance.
  • Internal state propagation remains stable over repeated evaluation.
4. Test Evidence
beta=n/Sum(ln(T/ti)); lambda=n/T^beta; instantaneous lambda(t)=lambda x beta x t^(beta-1); MTBF=1/lambda(t). Duane plot uses log10 safe transform. Table and plot validated.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
RSE-07 Hazard & Density Engine
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate exponential and Erlang-k density, reliability and hazard outputs with curve normalization.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing reliability/safety mathematics.
  • Boundary, malformed-input and deterministic-output consistency testing.
  • Visualisation/plot integrity checks where applicable.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • All computed values match analytical formulae to floating-point tolerance.
  • Internal state propagation remains stable over repeated evaluation.
4. Test Evidence
f_exp=lambda x e^(-lambda x t), R_exp=e^(-lambda x t), h_exp=lambda. Erlang-k: f=(lambda^k x t^(k-1) x e^(-lambda x t))/(k-1)!; R=e^(-lambda x t) x Sum((lambda x t)^j/j!). Plot scaled against max(f).
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
RSE-08 SIL/PL Technical Compliance Engine
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate PFH low/high-demand models, beta-factor redundancy, DCavg, MTTFd, CCF and PL/SIL ladder mapping.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing reliability/safety mathematics.
  • Boundary, malformed-input and deterministic-output consistency testing.
  • Visualisation/plot integrity checks where applicable.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • All computed values match analytical formulae to floating-point tolerance.
  • Internal state propagation remains stable over repeated evaluation.
4. Test Evidence
Low-demand PFH: (lambda_DU x T/2)+DD_term. High-demand PFH uses beta-model. SIL by PFH bands. PL via ISO 13849 decision matrix using Cat, DCavg, MTTFd, CCF. UI ladder and matrix validated.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
RSE-09 FMEDA Diagnostic Coverage Tool
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate FIT-based lambda allocations, DU/DD per DC, SFF and DC aggregation.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing reliability/safety mathematics.
  • Boundary, malformed-input and deterministic-output consistency testing.
  • Visualisation/plot integrity checks where applicable.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • All computed values match analytical formulae to floating-point tolerance.
  • Internal state propagation remains stable over repeated evaluation.
4. Test Evidence
lambda_mode=FIT x split; DU/DD split via DC; SFF=(S+DD)/Total; DC=DD/(DD+DU). Table semantics verified for safe vs dangerous modes.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
RSE-10 FRACAS Incident Manager
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate closed-loop logging, MTTR, closure rate, status transitions and audit export.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing reliability/safety mathematics.
  • Boundary, malformed-input and deterministic-output consistency testing.
  • Visualisation/plot integrity checks where applicable.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • All computed values match analytical formulae to floating-point tolerance.
  • Internal state propagation remains stable over repeated evaluation.
4. Test Evidence
MTTR=mean(closed-created)/86400s; ClosureRate=closed/total; ID collision protection; persistent storage and PDF/XLSX audit verified.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
Signoff: Jarryd Giose / 25-02-2026 Retest status: Pending
VR
SCE Tools Verification
Supply Chain Engineering
▾
Record overview
Batch
Batch 7, Technical Standard
Tools verified
10
Overall result
PASS
✓ 10 pass
Tool verification records
SCE-01 Lead-Time & Service Level Optimizer
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate safety stock and reorder point under lead-time variability.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing equations and deterministic rule checks.
  • Boundary, exception, malformed-input and multi-scenario validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Computed outputs match analytical formulas within rounding precision.
  • State transitions are stable and traceable under repeat execution.
4. Test Evidence
Safety Stock (lead-time variability) = Z x AvgDemand x sigma_LT; Reorder Point = (AvgDemand x AvgLT) + SS. Exposure gauge computed from Sum(SS) vs threshold.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
SCE-02 Safety Stock Engine
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate SS for service-level and cycle protection; cost buffers and holding charges.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing equations and deterministic rule checks.
  • Boundary, exception, malformed-input and multi-scenario validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Computed outputs match analytical formulas within rounding precision.
  • State transitions are stable and traceable under repeat execution.
4. Test Evidence
SS = Z x sigma_Demand x sqrt(LT); Buffer Value = SS x UnitCost; Holding = 15% x Buffer. Visual risk pointer scaled to average LT.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
SCE-03 Incoterms Cost Split Analyzer
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate seller/buyer cost attribution by term with seller% rules.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing equations and deterministic rule checks.
  • Boundary, exception, malformed-input and multi-scenario validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Computed outputs match analytical formulas within rounding precision.
  • State transitions are stable and traceable under repeat execution.
4. Test Evidence
SellerCost = Freight x SellerPct(term); BuyerCost = Cargo + (Freight - SellerCost). Handover bar width = SellerPct%.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
SCE-04 Supplier Capacity & Ramp Estimator
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate capacity, utilization and ramp-phase classification.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing equations and deterministic rule checks.
  • Boundary, exception, malformed-input and multi-scenario validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Computed outputs match analytical formulas within rounding precision.
  • State transitions are stable and traceable under repeat execution.
4. Test Evidence
MaxCapacity = UnitsPerHour x HoursPerDay; Util% = Demand/MaxCapacity x 100; Phase: Initial(<50), Growth(<85), Peak(>=85), Surge(>100). System utilization = avg(Util%).
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
SCE-05 Currency Exposure Impact Simulator
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate base vs market exchange cost, variance and stress scenarios.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing equations and deterministic rule checks.
  • Boundary, exception, malformed-input and multi-scenario validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Computed outputs match analytical formulas within rounding precision.
  • State transitions are stable and traceable under repeat execution.
4. Test Evidence
BaseCost=Exposure/BaseRate; MarketCost=Exposure/MarketRate; Variance=BaseCost-MarketCost; Portfolio impact=Sum(Variance). Stress test shifts MarketRate by +/-delta.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
SCE-06 MOQ / EOQ Optimizer
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate EOQ, total cost, MOQ penalty and efficiency index.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing equations and deterministic rule checks.
  • Boundary, exception, malformed-input and multi-scenario validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Computed outputs match analytical formulas within rounding precision.
  • State transitions are stable and traceable under repeat execution.
4. Test Evidence
EOQ=sqrt(2DS/H); TC(Q)=(D/Q x S)+(Q/2 x H); Penalty=max(0,TC(MOQ)-TC(EOQ)); Efficiency=(TC(EOQ)/TC(MOQ)) x 100%.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
SCE-07 Multi-Sourcing Decision Matrix
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate weighted risk score and quadrant placement vs price.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing equations and deterministic rule checks.
  • Boundary, exception, malformed-input and multi-scenario validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Computed outputs match analytical formulas within rounding precision.
  • State transitions are stable and traceable under repeat execution.
4. Test Evidence
Risk = 0.4 x Q + 0.3 x G + 0.3 x L; Status bands: <=4 IDEAL, <=7 CAUTION, >7 CRITICAL; Quadrant mapping: X=Price/maxPrice, Y=Risk/10.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
SCE-08 Network Transit & Buffer Planner
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate route base time, buffer days and max lead-time with segmented visualization.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing equations and deterministic rule checks.
  • Boundary, exception, malformed-input and multi-scenario validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Computed outputs match analytical formulas within rounding precision.
  • State transitions are stable and traceable under repeat execution.
4. Test Evidence
BaseTotal=Main+Port+Inland; BufferDays=round(BaseTotal x Buffer%); MaxLT=BaseTotal+BufferDays; Timeline segment widths proportional to days/MaxLT.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
SCE-09 Supplier Concentration Index (HHI)
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate HHI aggregation and concentration classification bands.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing equations and deterministic rule checks.
  • Boundary, exception, malformed-input and multi-scenario validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Computed outputs match analytical formulas within rounding precision.
  • State transitions are stable and traceable under repeat execution.
4. Test Evidence
Share_i=Spend_i/TotalSpend x 100; HHI=Sum(Share_i^2); Labels: Diversified(<1500), Moderate(<=2500), High(>2500). Gauge fill=HHI/10000.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
SCE-10 Purchase Price Variance (PPV) Dashboard
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate unit delta, total PPV and portfolio impact %.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing equations and deterministic rule checks.
  • Boundary, exception, malformed-input and multi-scenario validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Computed outputs match analytical formulas within rounding precision.
  • State transitions are stable and traceable under repeat execution.
4. Test Evidence
UnitDelta=Actual-Standard; TotalPPV=UnitDelta x Qty; PortfolioImpact%=Sum(PPV)/Sum(Standard x Qty) x 100; Status tags by sign.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
Signoff: Jarryd Giose / 25-02-2026 Retest status: Pending
VR
SQE Tools Verification
Supplier Quality Engineering
▾
Record overview
Batch
SQE Tools 1-10
Tools verified
10
Overall result
PASS (Partial)
✓ 8 pass ◐ 1 partial ✗ 1 fail
Tool verification records
SQE-01 ISO 2859-1 Sampling
PASS (Partial) ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate sampling code-letter logic, sample size and Ac/Re output.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: Validate dynamic update behaviour.
  • Analytical: Compare against ISO 2859-1 expected values.
  • Boundary: Confirm behaviour across valid test ranges.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: Must match analytical results exactly.
  • Qualitative: Must remain stable across valid inputs.
4. Test Evidence
Lot=1500, AQL=1% -> Code J, Sample 80, Ac2/Re3.
5. Result
PASS (Partial)
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
⚠ Partial table coverage; remaining ISO code letters not implemented.
7. Retest Status
Pending
SQE-02 AQL vs LTPD Mapper
PASS ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate Poisson-based OC curve calculations.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: Confirm interactive chart updates.
  • Analytical: Validate probability outputs.
  • Boundary: Confirm stability across defect levels.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: Must match analytical results exactly.
  • Qualitative: Must remain stable across valid inputs.
4. Test Evidence
n=50, c=1, AQL=1% -> alpha approx 9.1%.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
SQE-03 C=0 Calculator
PASS ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Verify correct binomial sample size calculation for C=0.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: Input-driven recalculation validated.
  • Analytical: Verified using Squeglia formula.
  • Boundary: Confirmed sample cap at lot size.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: Must match analytical results exactly.
  • Qualitative: Must remain stable across valid inputs.
4. Test Evidence
AQL=1%, 90% confidence -> n=230.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
SQE-04 Supplier Scorecard
PASS ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate weighted supplier scoring equation.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: Score updates verified.
  • Analytical: 50/30/20 weighting confirmed.
  • Boundary: Stable behaviour.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: Must match analytical results exactly.
  • Qualitative: Must remain stable across valid inputs.
4. Test Evidence
PPM=500, OTD=95, Audit=90 -> Score=92.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
SQE-05 PPM to Sigma
PASS ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate sigma conversion from PPM using Z-score.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: Sigma shift toggle verified.
  • Analytical: Z-score approximation confirmed.
  • Boundary: Minor precision limitations noted.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: Must match analytical results exactly.
  • Qualitative: Must remain stable across valid inputs.
4. Test Evidence
3.4 ppm -> 6.00 sigma.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
SQE-06 Carbon Footprint
PASS ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate emissions using weight x distance x factor.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: Recalculation confirmed.
  • Analytical: DEFRA factor verification.
  • Boundary: Stable across ranges.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: Must match analytical results exactly.
  • Qualitative: Must remain stable across valid inputs.
4. Test Evidence
1.5 t x 500 km x 0.062 -> 46.5 kg CO2e.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
SQE-07 SCAR Tracker
PASS ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate SCAR aging and escalation rules.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: Date-based recalculation validated.
  • Analytical: Escalation thresholds correct.
  • Boundary: Stable across time ranges.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: Must match analytical results exactly.
  • Qualitative: Must remain stable across valid inputs.
4. Test Evidence
SCAR aged 5 days -> RCA phase.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
SQE-08 Counterfeit Risk
PASS ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate S x C x I counterfeit risk scoring.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: Correct score updates.
  • Analytical: S x C x I multiplication validated.
  • Boundary: Stable across ranges.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: Must match analytical results exactly.
  • Qualitative: Must remain stable across valid inputs.
4. Test Evidence
Source7 x Crit10 x Insp1 -> Score=70.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
SQE-09 Inter-Rater Kappa
PASS ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate Cohen's Kappa statistical agreement formula.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: Updates validated.
  • Analytical: Po and Pe computations correct.
  • Boundary: Stable across matrices.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: Must match analytical results exactly.
  • Qualitative: Must remain stable across valid inputs.
4. Test Evidence
45/2/3/10 -> kappa approx 0.76.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
SQE-10 Duty & Tariff Tool
FAIL ▾
Version
1.0
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate CIF-based duty and tariff calculation.
2. Test Methods
  • Functional: Updates validated.
  • Analytical: Tariff applied incorrectly; wrong base.
  • Boundary: Error consistent.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • Quantitative: Must match analytical results exactly.
  • Qualitative: Must remain stable across valid inputs.
4. Test Evidence
CIF=106 -> Expected total 135.15; tool gives 134.10.
5. Result
FAIL
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
⚠ Incorrect tariff base; corrective update required.
7. Retest Status
Pending
Signoff: Jarryd Giose / 25-02-2026 Retest status: Pending
VR
SYSTEMS Tools Verification
Validation & Requirements
▾
Record overview
Batch
Batch 6, Technical Standard
Tools verified
10
Overall result
PASS
✓ 10 pass
Tool verification records
SYS-01 Requirements Quality Checker
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate linguistic-quality scoring engine using rule-based checks (subject, SHALL, measurable quantities).
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing logic equations and rule engines.
  • Boundary, exception, malformed-input and deterministic-output validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • All computed results must match analytical formulas to expected rounding precision.
  • State changes must be deterministic, traceable and stable under repeat execution.
4. Test Evidence
Regex-based detection of atomicity, mandatory SHALL binding, modal-verb penalties, passive-voice detection, unverifiable-term rejection, measurement-unit parsing and tolerance patterns. Verified across multiple sentence structures.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
SYS-02 Traceability Matrix Builder
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate requirement-to-test mapping, ID validation, coverage calculations and orphan detection.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing logic equations and rule engines.
  • Boundary, exception, malformed-input and deterministic-output validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • All computed results must match analytical formulas to expected rounding precision.
  • State changes must be deterministic, traceable and stable under repeat execution.
4. Test Evidence
ID validated via ^(REQ|SYS|SW|HW)-\d+$; linkage: tid==TBD -> ORPHAN; coverage=linked/total; matrix sorted by insertion order with sanitised inputs.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
SYS-03 V&V Intelligence Engine
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate WMC, RSI, PassRate, severity penalty, WRI clamp and gating logic.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing logic equations and rule engines.
  • Boundary, exception, malformed-input and deterministic-output validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • All computed results must match analytical formulas to expected rounding precision.
  • State changes must be deterministic, traceable and stable under repeat execution.
4. Test Evidence
WMC=((T x 1.0)+(A x 0.7)+(I x 0.4))/(T+A+I); RSI=1-((Add x 1.0+Chg x 0.8+Rem x 0.5)/Baseline); PassRate=P/(P+F+B); SeverityPenalty=Sum(S1 x 0.3+S2 x 0.15+...) x Criticality; WRI=clamp(WMC x RSI x Maturity x PassRate-Penalty).
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
SYS-04 Acceptance Criteria Analyzer
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate clarity scoring via unit detection, duration detection, IF-THEN logic, actor detection and environment qualifiers.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing logic equations and rule engines.
  • Boundary, exception, malformed-input and deterministic-output validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • All computed results must match analytical formulas to expected rounding precision.
  • State changes must be deterministic, traceable and stable under repeat execution.
4. Test Evidence
unitRegex validates engineering units; durRegex validates timing; conditionalRegex for GIVEN/IF->THEN; rangeRegex, sciRegex, tolRegex enforce boundaries; actorRegex enforces SUT presence; vague-term dictionary reduces clarity score.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
SYS-05 TPM Performance Tracker
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate limit-mode logic (MAX/MIN/BAND), margin computation, risk thresholds and trend logic.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing logic equations and rule engines.
  • Boundary, exception, malformed-input and deterministic-output validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • All computed results must match analytical formulas to expected rounding precision.
  • State changes must be deterministic, traceable and stable under repeat execution.
4. Test Evidence
MAX mode: usage=(Actual/Limit) x 100 -> WARNING@>=Warn% CRITICAL@>=Crit%; MIN mode: shortfallPct=((Limit-Actual)/Limit) x 100 -> risk classification; BAND mode: margin=min(|Actual-Low|,|High-Actual|), outside band=CRITICAL. Trend computed via delta-Actual/Previous.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
SYS-06 Risk-Based Test Prioritizer
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate P x I scoring and classification into P1/P2/P3.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing logic equations and rule engines.
  • Boundary, exception, malformed-input and deterministic-output validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • All computed results must match analytical formulas to expected rounding precision.
  • State changes must be deterministic, traceable and stable under repeat execution.
4. Test Evidence
PriorityScore=Probability x Impact; P1>=12, P2>=6, else P3; schedule sorted descending by score with duplicate-ID rejection.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
SYS-07 FFBD Tool
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate hierarchical block numbering, AND/OR/SERIAL logic tagging, drag reordering and auto-ref synchronisation.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing logic equations and rule engines.
  • Boundary, exception, malformed-input and deterministic-output validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • All computed results must match analytical formulas to expected rounding precision.
  • State changes must be deterministic, traceable and stable under repeat execution.
4. Test Evidence
Ref structure validated via ^\d+(\.\d+)*$; child insertion increments deepest segment; tree sorted numeric-locally; gate types enforced per item; UI drag-drop consistency verified.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
SYS-08 Requirement Complexity Scorer
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate complexity index based on breadth, dependency and verifiability weightings.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing logic equations and rule engines.
  • Boundary, exception, malformed-input and deterministic-output validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • All computed results must match analytical formulas to expected rounding precision.
  • State changes must be deterministic, traceable and stable under repeat execution.
4. Test Evidence
Score=((Breadth+Dependency+Verifiability)/15) x 100; threshold tiers: >=75 CRITICAL, >=45 MODERATE, else LOW.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
SYS-09 Safety Traceability Engine
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate hazard scoring (S x E x C), ASIL assignment and linked/orphan detection.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing logic equations and rule engines.
  • Boundary, exception, malformed-input and deterministic-output validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • All computed results must match analytical formulas to expected rounding precision.
  • State changes must be deterministic, traceable and stable under repeat execution.
4. Test Evidence
RPN=S x E x C; ASIL: D if RPN>=60, else C>=40, else B>=20, else QM; link state=(MitigationReq present? LINKED : ORPHAN); sorted by RPN descending.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
SYS-10 V&V Scheduler
PASS ▾
Owner
Jarryd Giose
1. Verification Objective
Validate milestone ordering, risk-tagging, method gate-rules and conflict detection.
2. Test Methods
  • Analytical reconstruction of governing logic equations and rule engines.
  • Boundary, exception, malformed-input and deterministic-output validation.
3. Acceptance Criteria
  • All computed results must match analytical formulas to expected rounding precision.
  • State changes must be deterministic, traceable and stable under repeat execution.
4. Test Evidence
Each method maps allowed gates; schedule sorted by milestoneIndex then date; sequence conflict flagged if date < previous; timeline marks active gates; health stats computed from METHOD_RULES.
5. Result
PASS
6. Issues & Corrective Actions
None
7. Retest Status
Pending
Signoff: Jarryd Giose / 25-02-2026 Retest status: Pending
© M&Q Engineering Solutions
Regulatory Basis: ISO 29148, IEC 61508, ISO 13849